Skip to content

Head-to-head

Gluu vs Zabbix

Zabbix carries 48.0× the disclosed CVE volume of Gluu. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Gluu versus Zabbix. Each row gives the metric, Gluu’s count on the left and Zabbix’s count on the right.
GluuMetricZabbix
2Total CVEs96
1Critical14
0High28
1Medium35
0Low19
0Open in latest67
1Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Gluu

50.0% critical
Critical
150.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
150.0%
Low
00.0%

Zabbix

14.6% critical
Critical
1414.6%
High
2829.2%
Medium
3536.5%
Low
1919.8%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Gluu

Recent CVEs affecting Gluu
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2022-36663(opens NVD record)Critical
9.8
Sep 6, 2022
CVE-2020-9012(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Feb 16, 2020

Zabbix

Recent CVEs affecting Zabbix
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-23925(opens NVD record)High
8.1
Mar 6, 2026
CVE-2025-49641(opens NVD record)Medium
4.3
Oct 3, 2025
CVE-2025-27236(opens NVD record)Medium
6.5
Oct 3, 2025
CVE-2025-27231(opens NVD record)Medium
4.9
Oct 3, 2025
CVE-2025-27240(opens NVD record)High
7.2
Sep 12, 2025
CVE-2025-27238(opens NVD record)Low
3.5
Sep 12, 2025