Skip to content

Head-to-head

Gluu vs Zabbix

Zabbix carries 53.0× the disclosed CVE volume of Gluu. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Gluu versus Zabbix. Each row gives the metric, Gluu’s count on the left and Zabbix’s count on the right.
GluuMetricZabbix
1Total CVEs53
1Critical8
0High11
0Medium17
0Low17
0Open in latest67
1Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Gluu

100.0% critical
Critical
1100.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
00.0%
Low
00.0%

Zabbix

15.1% critical
Critical
815.1%
High
1120.8%
Medium
1732.1%
Low
1732.1%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Gluu

Recent CVEs affecting Gluu
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2022-36663(opens NVD record)Critical
9.8
Sep 6, 2022

Zabbix

Recent CVEs affecting Zabbix
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-23925(opens NVD record)High
8.1
Mar 6, 2026
CVE-2025-49641(opens NVD record)Medium
4.3
Oct 3, 2025
CVE-2025-27236(opens NVD record)Medium
6.5
Oct 3, 2025
CVE-2025-27231(opens NVD record)Medium
4.9
Oct 3, 2025
CVE-2025-27240(opens NVD record)High
7.2
Sep 12, 2025
CVE-2025-27238(opens NVD record)Low
3.5
Sep 12, 2025