Head-to-head
Forcepoint vs Ping Identity
Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.
01
Disclosure record
Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.
| Forcepoint | Metric | Ping Identity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Total CVEs | 0 | ||
| 0 | Critical | 0 | ||
| 1 | High | 0 | ||
| 1 | Medium | 0 | ||
| 0 | Low | 0 | ||
| 5 | Open in latest | 9 | ||
| 2 | Product families | 1 |
02
Risk profile
Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.
Forcepoint
0.0% critical- Critical
- 00.0%
- High
- 150.0%
- Medium
- 150.0%
- Low
- 00.0%
Ping Identity
— critical- Critical
- 0—
- High
- 0—
- Medium
- 0—
- Low
- 0—
03
Recent activity
Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.
Forcepoint
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-2274(opens NVD record) | Medium | 6.1 | Mar 16, 2026 |
| CVE-2025-12690(opens NVD record) | High | 7.8 | Mar 11, 2026 |
Ping Identity
No CVEs in this window.