Skip to content

Head-to-head

Forcepoint vs Ping Identity

Forcepoint carries a disclosed CVE volume comparable to Ping Identity. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Forcepoint versus Ping Identity. Each row gives the metric, Forcepoint’s count on the left and Ping Identity’s count on the right.
ForcepointMetricPing Identity
2Total CVEs2
0Critical0
1High0
1Medium1
0Low1
5Open in latest9
2Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Forcepoint

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
150.0%
Medium
150.0%
Low
00.0%

Ping Identity

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
150.0%
Low
150.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Forcepoint

Recent CVEs affecting Forcepoint
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2025-2274(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Mar 16, 2026
CVE-2025-12690(opens NVD record)High
7.8
Mar 11, 2026

Ping Identity

Recent CVEs affecting Ping Identity
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2024-22477(opens NVD record)Low
1.8
Jul 9, 2024
CVE-2024-22377(opens NVD record)Medium
5.3
Jul 9, 2024