Skip to content

Head-to-head

Cisco Duo vs Trellix/McAfee

Trellix/McAfee carries 40.0× the disclosed CVE volume of Cisco Duo. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Cisco Duo versus Trellix/McAfee. Each row gives the metric, Cisco Duo’s count on the left and Trellix/McAfee’s count on the right.
Cisco DuoMetricTrellix/McAfee
2Total CVEs80
0Critical5
0High27
2Medium42
0Low6
2Open in latest38
1Product families2
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Cisco Duo

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
2100.0%
Low
00.0%

Trellix/McAfee

6.3% critical
Critical
56.3%
High
2733.8%
Medium
4252.5%
Low
67.5%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Cisco Duo

Recent CVEs affecting Cisco Duo
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2025-20258(opens NVD record)Medium
5.4
May 21, 2025
CVE-2023-20207(opens NVD record)Medium
4.9
Jul 12, 2023
CVE-2023-20199(opens NVD record)Medium
6.2
Jun 28, 2023
CVE-2023-20123(opens NVD record)Medium
6.3
Apr 5, 2023
CVE-2022-20662(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Sep 30, 2022
CVE-2021-1492(opens NVD record)Medium
6.6
Mar 25, 2021

Trellix/McAfee

Recent CVEs affecting Trellix/McAfee
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2022-1254(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Apr 20, 2022
CVE-2021-45105(opens NVD record)Medium
5.9
Dec 18, 2021
CVE-2021-4038(opens NVD record)Medium
4.8
Dec 9, 2021
CVE-2021-20026(opens NVD record)High
8.8
May 27, 2021
CVE-2021-3450(opens NVD record)High
7.4
Mar 25, 2021
CVE-2021-3449(opens NVD record)Medium
5.9
Mar 25, 2021