Head-to-head
Cisco Duo vs Trellix/McAfee
Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.
01
Disclosure record
Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.
| Cisco Duo | Metric | Trellix/McAfee | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Total CVEs | 0 | ||
| 0 | Critical | 0 | ||
| 0 | High | 0 | ||
| 0 | Medium | 0 | ||
| 0 | Low | 0 | ||
| 2 | Open in latest | 38 | ||
| 1 | Product families | 2 |
02
Risk profile
Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.
Cisco Duo
— critical- Critical
- 0—
- High
- 0—
- Medium
- 0—
- Low
- 0—
Trellix/McAfee
— critical- Critical
- 0—
- High
- 0—
- Medium
- 0—
- Low
- 0—
03
Recent activity
Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.
Cisco Duo
No CVEs in this window.
Trellix/McAfee
No CVEs in this window.