Skip to content

Head-to-head

Ping Identity vs WatchGuard

Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Ping Identity versus WatchGuard. Each row gives the metric, Ping Identity’s count on the left and WatchGuard’s count on the right.
Ping IdentityMetricWatchGuard
0Total CVEs17
0Critical2
0High7
0Medium8
0Low0
9Open in latest18
1Product families2
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Ping Identity

critical
Critical
0
High
0
Medium
0
Low
0

WatchGuard

11.8% critical
Critical
211.8%
High
741.2%
Medium
847.1%
Low
00.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Ping Identity

No CVEs in this window.

WatchGuard

Recent CVEs affecting WatchGuard
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-3344(opens NVD record)Medium
4.9
Mar 3, 2026
CVE-2026-3343(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Mar 3, 2026
CVE-2026-3342(opens NVD record)High
7.2
Mar 3, 2026
CVE-2025-14733(opens NVD record)Critical
9.8
Dec 19, 2025
CVE-2025-6946(opens NVD record)Medium
4.8
Dec 4, 2025
CVE-2025-1547(opens NVD record)High
7.2
Dec 4, 2025