Head-to-head
Ping Identity vs Trellix/McAfee
Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.
01
Disclosure record
Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.
| Ping Identity | Metric | Trellix/McAfee | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Total CVEs | 0 | ||
| 0 | Critical | 0 | ||
| 0 | High | 0 | ||
| 1 | Medium | 0 | ||
| 1 | Low | 0 | ||
| 9 | Open in latest | 38 | ||
| 1 | Product families | 2 |
02
Risk profile
Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.
Ping Identity
0.0% critical- Critical
- 00.0%
- High
- 00.0%
- Medium
- 150.0%
- Low
- 150.0%
Trellix/McAfee
— critical- Critical
- 0—
- High
- 0—
- Medium
- 0—
- Low
- 0—
03
Recent activity
Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.
Ping Identity
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-22477(opens NVD record) | Low | 1.8 | Jul 9, 2024 |
| CVE-2024-22377(opens NVD record) | Medium | 5.3 | Jul 9, 2024 |
Trellix/McAfee
No CVEs in this window.