Skip to content

Head-to-head

Ping Identity vs Tailscale

Ping Identity carries 5.7× the disclosed CVE volume of Tailscale. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Ping Identity versus Tailscale. Each row gives the metric, Ping Identity’s count on the left and Tailscale’s count on the right.
Ping IdentityMetricTailscale
17Total CVEs3
1Critical1
6High1
8Medium1
2Low0
9Open in latest0
1Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Ping Identity

5.9% critical
Critical
15.9%
High
635.3%
Medium
847.1%
Low
211.8%

Tailscale

33.3% critical
Critical
133.3%
High
133.3%
Medium
133.3%
Low
00.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Ping Identity

Recent CVEs affecting Ping Identity
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2024-22477(opens NVD record)Low
1.8
Jul 9, 2024
CVE-2024-22377(opens NVD record)Medium
5.3
Jul 9, 2024
CVE-2023-40545(opens NVD record)High
8.8
Feb 6, 2024
CVE-2023-36496(opens NVD record)High
7.7
Feb 1, 2024
CVE-2023-39219(opens NVD record)High
7.5
Oct 25, 2023
CVE-2023-37283(opens NVD record)High
8.1
Oct 25, 2023

Tailscale

Recent CVEs affecting Tailscale
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2023-28436(opens NVD record)Medium
5.7
Mar 23, 2023
CVE-2022-41925(opens NVD record)High
8.8
Nov 23, 2022
CVE-2022-41924(opens NVD record)Critical
9.6
Nov 23, 2022