Skip to content

Head-to-head

Okta vs Zabbix

Zabbix carries 16.5× the disclosed CVE volume of Okta. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Okta versus Zabbix. Each row gives the metric, Okta’s count on the left and Zabbix’s count on the right.
OktaMetricZabbix
2Total CVEs33
0Critical4
1High7
1Medium9
0Low13
0Open in latest67
1Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Okta

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
150.0%
Medium
150.0%
Low
00.0%

Zabbix

12.1% critical
Critical
412.1%
High
721.2%
Medium
927.3%
Low
1339.4%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Okta

Recent CVEs affecting Okta
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2024-9191(opens NVD record)High
7.1
Nov 1, 2024
CVE-2024-7061(opens NVD record)Medium
5.5
Aug 7, 2024

Zabbix

Recent CVEs affecting Zabbix
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-23925(opens NVD record)High
8.1
Mar 6, 2026
CVE-2025-49641(opens NVD record)Medium
4.3
Oct 3, 2025
CVE-2025-27236(opens NVD record)Medium
6.5
Oct 3, 2025
CVE-2025-27231(opens NVD record)Medium
4.9
Oct 3, 2025
CVE-2025-27240(opens NVD record)High
7.2
Sep 12, 2025
CVE-2025-27238(opens NVD record)Low
3.5
Sep 12, 2025