Head-to-head
Okta vs Paessler
Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.
01
Disclosure record
Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.
| Okta | Metric | Paessler | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Total CVEs | 3 | ||
| 0 | Critical | 0 | ||
| 0 | High | 0 | ||
| 0 | Medium | 3 | ||
| 0 | Low | 0 | ||
| 0 | Open in latest | 9 | ||
| 1 | Product families | 1 |
02
Risk profile
Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.
Okta
— critical- Critical
- 0—
- High
- 0—
- Medium
- 0—
- Low
- 0—
Paessler
0.0% critical- Critical
- 00.0%
- High
- 00.0%
- Medium
- 3100.0%
- Low
- 00.0%
03
Recent activity
Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.
Okta
No CVEs in this window.
Paessler
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-67835(opens NVD record) | Medium | 6.5 | Jan 14, 2026 |
| CVE-2025-67834(opens NVD record) | Medium | 5.4 | Jan 14, 2026 |
| CVE-2025-67833(opens NVD record) | Medium | 6.1 | Jan 14, 2026 |