Skip to content

Head-to-head

Nokia vs Progress (Kemp LoadMaster)

Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Nokia versus Progress (Kemp LoadMaster). Each row gives the metric, Nokia’s count on the left and Progress (Kemp LoadMaster)’s count on the right.
NokiaMetricProgress (Kemp LoadMaster)
0Total CVEs15
0Critical1
0High13
0Medium1
0Low0
11Open in latest4
4Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Nokia

critical
Critical
0
High
0
Medium
0
Low
0

Progress (Kemp LoadMaster)

6.7% critical
Critical
16.7%
High
1386.7%
Medium
16.7%
Low
00.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Nokia

No CVEs in this window.

Progress (Kemp LoadMaster)

Recent CVEs affecting Progress (Kemp LoadMaster)
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-4048(opens NVD record)High
8.4
Apr 20, 2026
CVE-2026-3519(opens NVD record)High
8.4
Apr 20, 2026
CVE-2026-3518(opens NVD record)High
8.4
Apr 20, 2026
CVE-2026-3517(opens NVD record)High
8.4
Apr 20, 2026
CVE-2025-13447(opens NVD record)High
8.4
Jan 13, 2026
CVE-2025-13444(opens NVD record)High
8.4
Jan 13, 2026