Skip to content

Head-to-head

Juniper vs Ping Identity

Juniper carries 102.0× the disclosed CVE volume of Ping Identity. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Juniper versus Ping Identity. Each row gives the metric, Juniper’s count on the left and Ping Identity’s count on the right.
JuniperMetricPing Identity
204Total CVEs2
2Critical0
69High0
133Medium1
0Low1
908Open in latest9
4Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Juniper

1.0% critical
Critical
21.0%
High
6933.8%
Medium
13365.2%
Low
00.0%

Ping Identity

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
150.0%
Low
150.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Juniper

Recent CVEs affecting Juniper
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-33797(opens NVD record)High
7.4
Apr 9, 2026
CVE-2026-33793(opens NVD record)High
7.8
Apr 9, 2026
CVE-2026-33791(opens NVD record)Medium
6.7
Apr 9, 2026
CVE-2026-33790(opens NVD record)High
7.5
Apr 9, 2026
CVE-2026-33787(opens NVD record)Medium
5.5
Apr 9, 2026
CVE-2026-33786(opens NVD record)Medium
5.5
Apr 9, 2026

Ping Identity

Recent CVEs affecting Ping Identity
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2024-22477(opens NVD record)Low
1.8
Jul 9, 2024
CVE-2024-22377(opens NVD record)Medium
5.3
Jul 9, 2024