Skip to content

Head-to-head

HAProxy vs Paessler

HAProxy carries 1.3× the disclosed CVE volume of Paessler. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: HAProxy versus Paessler. Each row gives the metric, HAProxy’s count on the left and Paessler’s count on the right.
HAProxyMetricPaessler
4Total CVEs3
0Critical0
3High0
1Medium3
0Low0
14Open in latest9
1Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

HAProxy

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
375.0%
Medium
125.0%
Low
00.0%

Paessler

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
3100.0%
Low
00.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

HAProxy

Recent CVEs affecting HAProxy
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-55204(opens NVD record)High
7.5
Jun 18, 2026
CVE-2026-55203(opens NVD record)High
7.5
Jun 18, 2026
CVE-2026-33555(opens NVD record)Medium
4.0
Apr 13, 2026
CVE-2025-11230(opens NVD record)High
7.5
Nov 19, 2025

Paessler

Recent CVEs affecting Paessler
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2025-67835(opens NVD record)Medium
6.5
Jan 14, 2026
CVE-2025-67834(opens NVD record)Medium
5.4
Jan 14, 2026
CVE-2025-67833(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Jan 14, 2026