Skip to content

Head-to-head

Forcepoint vs IBM Security Identity

IBM Security Identity carries 7.0× the disclosed CVE volume of Forcepoint. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Forcepoint versus IBM Security Identity. Each row gives the metric, Forcepoint’s count on the left and IBM Security Identity’s count on the right.
ForcepointMetricIBM Security Identity
2Total CVEs14
0Critical2
1High7
1Medium4
0Low1
5Open in latest108
2Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Forcepoint

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
150.0%
Medium
150.0%
Low
00.0%

IBM Security Identity

14.3% critical
Critical
214.3%
High
750.0%
Medium
428.6%
Low
17.1%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Forcepoint

Recent CVEs affecting Forcepoint
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2025-2274(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Mar 16, 2026
CVE-2025-12690(opens NVD record)High
7.8
Mar 11, 2026

IBM Security Identity

Recent CVEs affecting IBM Security Identity
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-5926(opens NVD record)Medium
6.5
Apr 23, 2026
CVE-2026-1346(opens NVD record)Critical
9.3
Apr 8, 2026
CVE-2026-1343(opens NVD record)High
7.2
Apr 8, 2026
CVE-2026-1342(opens NVD record)High
8.5
Apr 8, 2026
CVE-2026-4364(opens NVD record)Medium
5.4
Apr 1, 2026
CVE-2026-4101(opens NVD record)High
8.1
Apr 1, 2026