Skip to content

Identity & Access Management · head-to-head

Okta vs Ping Identity

On-prem IAM/IGA/PAM/MFA: directories, federation, privileged access, SSO. Counts are scoped to this segment and the selected published-date window. Okta carries a disclosed CVE volume comparable to Ping Identity. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Okta versus Ping Identity. Each row gives the metric, Okta’s count on the left and Ping Identity’s count on the right.
OktaMetricPing Identity
2Total CVEs2
0Critical0
1High0
1Medium1
0Low1
0Open in latest9
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Okta

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
150.0%
Medium
150.0%
Low
00.0%

Ping Identity

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
150.0%
Low
150.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Okta

Recent CVEs affecting Okta
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2024-9191(opens NVD record)High
7.1
Nov 1, 2024
CVE-2024-7061(opens NVD record)Medium
5.5
Aug 7, 2024

Ping Identity

Recent CVEs affecting Ping Identity
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2024-22477(opens NVD record)Low
1.8
Jul 9, 2024
CVE-2024-22377(opens NVD record)Medium
5.3
Jul 9, 2024

Track new CVEs for these vendors

Get an email the moment a new vulnerability is disclosed for the products you rely on.

Get alerts