Skip to content

Identity & Access Management · head-to-head

Delinea vs Ping Identity

On-prem IAM/IGA/PAM/MFA: directories, federation, privileged access, SSO. Counts are scoped to this segment and the selected published-date window. Delinea carries 1.5× the disclosed CVE volume of Ping Identity. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Delinea versus Ping Identity. Each row gives the metric, Delinea’s count on the left and Ping Identity’s count on the right.
DelineaMetricPing Identity
3Total CVEs2
0Critical0
0High0
2Medium1
1Low1
8Open in latest9
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Delinea

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
266.7%
Low
133.3%

Ping Identity

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
150.0%
Low
150.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Delinea

Recent CVEs affecting Delinea
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2025-12810(opens NVD record)Medium
6.5
Jan 27, 2026
CVE-2025-6943(opens NVD record)Low
3.8
Jul 2, 2025
CVE-2024-12908(opens NVD record)Medium
6.9
Dec 26, 2024

Ping Identity

Recent CVEs affecting Ping Identity
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2024-22477(opens NVD record)Low
1.8
Jul 9, 2024
CVE-2024-22377(opens NVD record)Medium
5.3
Jul 9, 2024

Track new CVEs for these vendors

Get an email the moment a new vulnerability is disclosed for the products you rely on.

Get alerts