Skip to content

Identity & Access Management · head-to-head

Cisco Duo vs Okta

On-prem IAM/IGA/PAM/MFA: directories, federation, privileged access, SSO. Counts are scoped to this segment and the selected published-date window. Okta carries 5.0× the disclosed CVE volume of Cisco Duo. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Cisco Duo versus Okta. Each row gives the metric, Cisco Duo’s count on the left and Okta’s count on the right.
Cisco DuoMetricOkta
1Total CVEs5
0Critical0
0High3
1Medium1
0Low1
2Open in latest0
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Cisco Duo

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
1100.0%
Low
00.0%

Okta

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
360.0%
Medium
120.0%
Low
120.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Cisco Duo

Recent CVEs affecting Cisco Duo
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2023-20207(opens NVD record)Medium
4.9
Jul 12, 2023

Okta

Recent CVEs affecting Okta
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2024-9191(opens NVD record)High
7.1
Nov 1, 2024
CVE-2024-7061(opens NVD record)Medium
5.5
Aug 7, 2024
CVE-2023-0093(opens NVD record)High
8.8
Mar 6, 2023
CVE-2022-1697(opens NVD record)Low
3.9
Sep 6, 2022
CVE-2022-1030(opens NVD record)High
8.8
Mar 23, 2022

Track new CVEs for these vendors

Get an email the moment a new vulnerability is disclosed for the products you rely on.

Get alerts