Skip to content

Application Delivery / ADC · head-to-head

Barracuda vs Radware

L4-L7 load balancers, ADCs and reverse proxies. Counts are scoped to this segment and the selected published-date window. Barracuda carries 2.0× the disclosed CVE volume of Radware. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Barracuda versus Radware. Each row gives the metric, Barracuda’s count on the left and Radware’s count on the right.
BarracudaMetricRadware
2Total CVEs1
1Critical0
1High0
0Medium1
0Low0
6Open in latest1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Barracuda

50.0% critical
Critical
150.0%
High
150.0%
Medium
00.0%
Low
00.0%

Radware

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
1100.0%
Low
00.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Barracuda

Recent CVEs affecting Barracuda
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2014-2595(opens NVD record)Critical
9.8
Feb 12, 2020
CVE-2017-6320(opens NVD record)High
8.8
Jul 18, 2017

Radware

Recent CVEs affecting Radware
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2016-10212(opens NVD record)Medium
5.9
Feb 8, 2017

Track new CVEs for these vendors

Get an email the moment a new vulnerability is disclosed for the products you rely on.

Get alerts