Skip to content

Head-to-head

Cisco Duo vs Tailscale

Tailscale carries 1.5× the disclosed CVE volume of Cisco Duo. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Cisco Duo versus Tailscale. Each row gives the metric, Cisco Duo’s count on the left and Tailscale’s count on the right.
Cisco DuoMetricTailscale
2Total CVEs3
0Critical1
0High1
2Medium1
0Low0
2Open in latest0
1Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Cisco Duo

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
2100.0%
Low
00.0%

Tailscale

33.3% critical
Critical
133.3%
High
133.3%
Medium
133.3%
Low
00.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Cisco Duo

Recent CVEs affecting Cisco Duo
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2025-20258(opens NVD record)Medium
5.4
May 21, 2025
CVE-2023-20207(opens NVD record)Medium
4.9
Jul 12, 2023
CVE-2023-20199(opens NVD record)Medium
6.2
Jun 28, 2023
CVE-2023-20123(opens NVD record)Medium
6.3
Apr 5, 2023
CVE-2022-20662(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Sep 30, 2022
CVE-2021-1492(opens NVD record)Medium
6.6
Mar 25, 2021

Tailscale

Recent CVEs affecting Tailscale
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2023-28436(opens NVD record)Medium
5.7
Mar 23, 2023
CVE-2022-41925(opens NVD record)High
8.8
Nov 23, 2022
CVE-2022-41924(opens NVD record)Critical
9.6
Nov 23, 2022