Skip to content

Head-to-head

Cisco Duo vs Red Hat Keycloak

Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Cisco Duo versus Red Hat Keycloak. Each row gives the metric, Cisco Duo’s count on the left and Red Hat Keycloak’s count on the right.
Cisco DuoMetricRed Hat Keycloak
0Total CVEs14
0Critical1
0High7
0Medium4
0Low2
2Open in latest126
1Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Cisco Duo

critical
Critical
0
High
0
Medium
0
Low
0

Red Hat Keycloak

7.1% critical
Critical
17.1%
High
750.0%
Medium
428.6%
Low
214.3%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Cisco Duo

No CVEs in this window.

Red Hat Keycloak

Recent CVEs affecting Red Hat Keycloak
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-28369(opens NVD record)High
8.7
Mar 27, 2026
CVE-2026-28368(opens NVD record)High
8.7
Mar 27, 2026
CVE-2026-28367(opens NVD record)High
8.7
Mar 27, 2026
CVE-2026-3121(opens NVD record)Medium
6.5
Mar 26, 2026
CVE-2026-4874(opens NVD record)Low
3.1
Mar 26, 2026
CVE-2026-4366(opens NVD record)Medium
5.8
Mar 18, 2026