Head-to-head
Cisco Duo vs Ping Identity
Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.
01
Disclosure record
Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.
| Cisco Duo | Metric | Ping Identity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Total CVEs | 2 | ||
| 0 | Critical | 0 | ||
| 0 | High | 0 | ||
| 0 | Medium | 1 | ||
| 0 | Low | 1 | ||
| 2 | Open in latest | 9 | ||
| 1 | Product families | 1 |
02
Risk profile
Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.
Cisco Duo
— critical- Critical
- 0—
- High
- 0—
- Medium
- 0—
- Low
- 0—
Ping Identity
0.0% critical- Critical
- 00.0%
- High
- 00.0%
- Medium
- 150.0%
- Low
- 150.0%
03
Recent activity
Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.
Cisco Duo
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-20258(opens NVD record) | Medium | 5.4 | May 21, 2025 |
Ping Identity
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-22477(opens NVD record) | Low | 1.8 | Jul 9, 2024 |
| CVE-2024-22377(opens NVD record) | Medium | 5.3 | Jul 9, 2024 |