Skip to content

Head-to-head

Cisco Duo vs IBM Security Identity

IBM Security Identity carries 90.0× the disclosed CVE volume of Cisco Duo. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Cisco Duo versus IBM Security Identity. Each row gives the metric, Cisco Duo’s count on the left and IBM Security Identity’s count on the right.
Cisco DuoMetricIBM Security Identity
1Total CVEs90
0Critical6
0High33
1Medium45
0Low6
2Open in latest108
1Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Cisco Duo

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
1100.0%
Low
00.0%

IBM Security Identity

6.7% critical
Critical
66.7%
High
3336.7%
Medium
4550.0%
Low
66.7%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Cisco Duo

Recent CVEs affecting Cisco Duo
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2025-20258(opens NVD record)Medium
5.4
May 21, 2025
CVE-2023-20207(opens NVD record)Medium
4.9
Jul 12, 2023
CVE-2023-20199(opens NVD record)Medium
6.2
Jun 28, 2023
CVE-2023-20123(opens NVD record)Medium
6.3
Apr 5, 2023
CVE-2022-20662(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Sep 30, 2022

IBM Security Identity

Recent CVEs affecting IBM Security Identity
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-5926(opens NVD record)Medium
6.5
Apr 23, 2026
CVE-2026-1346(opens NVD record)Critical
9.3
Apr 8, 2026
CVE-2026-1343(opens NVD record)High
7.2
Apr 8, 2026
CVE-2026-1342(opens NVD record)High
8.5
Apr 8, 2026
CVE-2026-4364(opens NVD record)Medium
5.4
Apr 1, 2026
CVE-2026-4101(opens NVD record)High
8.1
Apr 1, 2026