Skip to content

Head-to-head

Cisco vs Ping Identity

Cisco carries 143.5× the disclosed CVE volume of Ping Identity. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Cisco versus Ping Identity. Each row gives the metric, Cisco’s count on the left and Ping Identity’s count on the right.
CiscoMetricPing Identity
287Total CVEs2
20Critical0
75High0
191Medium1
1Low1
2,330Open in latest9
5Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Cisco

7.0% critical
Critical
207.0%
High
7526.1%
Medium
19166.6%
Low
10.3%

Ping Identity

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
150.0%
Low
150.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Cisco

Recent CVEs affecting Cisco
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-20190(opens NVD record)High
7.5
Jun 17, 2026
CVE-2026-20181(opens NVD record)Critical
9.1
Jun 17, 2026
CVE-2026-20262(opens NVD record)Medium
6.5
Jun 15, 2026
CVE-2026-20245(opens NVD record)High
7.8
Jun 4, 2026
CVE-2026-20233(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Jun 3, 2026
CVE-2026-20230(opens NVD record)High
8.6
Jun 3, 2026

Ping Identity

Recent CVEs affecting Ping Identity
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2024-22477(opens NVD record)Low
1.8
Jul 9, 2024
CVE-2024-22377(opens NVD record)Medium
5.3
Jul 9, 2024