Skip to content

Head-to-head

Cisco vs Forcepoint

Cisco carries 143.5× the disclosed CVE volume of Forcepoint. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Cisco versus Forcepoint. Each row gives the metric, Cisco’s count on the left and Forcepoint’s count on the right.
CiscoMetricForcepoint
287Total CVEs2
20Critical0
75High1
191Medium1
1Low0
2,330Open in latest5
5Product families2
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Cisco

7.0% critical
Critical
207.0%
High
7526.1%
Medium
19166.6%
Low
10.3%

Forcepoint

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
150.0%
Medium
150.0%
Low
00.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Cisco

Recent CVEs affecting Cisco
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-20190(opens NVD record)High
7.5
Jun 17, 2026
CVE-2026-20181(opens NVD record)Critical
9.1
Jun 17, 2026
CVE-2026-20262(opens NVD record)Medium
6.5
Jun 15, 2026
CVE-2026-20245(opens NVD record)High
7.8
Jun 4, 2026
CVE-2026-20233(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Jun 3, 2026
CVE-2026-20230(opens NVD record)High
8.6
Jun 3, 2026

Forcepoint

Recent CVEs affecting Forcepoint
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2025-2274(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Mar 16, 2026
CVE-2025-12690(opens NVD record)High
7.8
Mar 11, 2026