Skip to content

Head-to-head

Check Point vs Paessler

Paessler carries 3.0× the disclosed CVE volume of Check Point. Volume reflects disclosure practice and install base as much as code quality — read it with the severity mix. Sourced from the NIST NVD; lower counts indicate a smaller disclosed vulnerability surface — not necessarily lower risk.

01

Disclosure record

Bars are normalized per row to the larger value; the leading count is emphasized.

Metric comparison: Check Point versus Paessler. Each row gives the metric, Check Point’s count on the left and Paessler’s count on the right.
Check PointMetricPaessler
1Total CVEs3
1Critical0
0High0
0Medium3
0Low0
16Open in latest9
4Product families1
02

Risk profile

Each severity band as a share of the vendor's own total — strips out raw volume so the profiles compare directly.

Check Point

100.0% critical
Critical
1100.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
00.0%
Low
00.0%

Paessler

0.0% critical
Critical
00.0%
High
00.0%
Medium
3100.0%
Low
00.0%
03

Recent activity

Latest in-window disclosures per vendor, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.

Check Point

Recent CVEs affecting Check Point
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2026-50751(opens NVD record)Critical
9.3
Jun 8, 2026
CVE-2024-52885(opens NVD record)Medium
5.0
Aug 6, 2025

Paessler

Recent CVEs affecting Paessler
CVESeverityCVSSPublished
CVE-2025-67835(opens NVD record)Medium
6.5
Jan 14, 2026
CVE-2025-67834(opens NVD record)Medium
5.4
Jan 14, 2026
CVE-2025-67833(opens NVD record)Medium
6.1
Jan 14, 2026