Vendor scorecard
Auth0
Auth0 security disclosure record — CVE volume, CVSS severity mix and product-category breakdown, sourced from the NIST NVD.
CPE: auth0
Product families
1
Open in latest
3
Inferred — see methodology
Last disclosure
May 27, 2026
01
Product categories
1 trackedCVE volume, severity mix and the inferred latest shipping version per category.
| Category | CVEs | Volume | Severity mix | Open | Inferred latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity PlatformIdentity & Access Managementauth0.js, jsonwebtoken, angular-jwt… | 4 | 3 | 0.4.0LOW |
02
Recent CVEs
4 shownMost recently published, newest first. Each ID links to its NVD record.
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Summary | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-42280(opens NVD record) | High | 7.1 | Auth0.js is a client-side JavaScript library for Auth0. From 8.11.0 to 9.32.0, under specific preconditions, the Auth0.js SDK may improperly return user profile information using a valid access token when a specifically crafted invalid ID token is provided. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.0.0. | May 27, 2026 |
| CVE-2022-23539(opens NVD record) | Medium | 5.9 | Versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm. You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than a combination listed in the GitHub Security Advisory as unaffected. This issue has been fixed, please update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure configuration. After updating to version 9.0.0, if you still intend to continue with signing or verifying tokens using invalid key type/algorithm value combinations, you’ll need to set the `allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes` option to `true` in the `sign()` and/or `verify()` functions. | Dec 23, 2022 |
| CVE-2022-23540(opens NVD record) | Medium | 6.4 | In versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library, lack of algorithm definition in the `jwt.verify()` function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the `none` algorithm for signature verification. Users are affected if you do not specify algorithms in the `jwt.verify()` function. This issue has been fixed, please update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the `jwt.verify()` method. There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the `none` algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in `jwt.verify()` options. | Dec 22, 2022 |
| CVE-2022-23541(opens NVD record) | Medium | 5.0 | jsonwebtoken is an implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Versions `<= 8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function referring to the `secretOrPublicKey` argument from the readme link will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification, other than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens. If your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function. This issue has been patched, please update to version 9.0.0. | Dec 22, 2022 |
4 CVEs · 1 product families