Live from the NIST NVD
One scoreboard for enterprise network security.
Despite the name, this is not a security score or ranking. We gather the public vulnerability record for major networking and security vendors, disclosed CVEs, severity data, and known exploited vulnerabilities, and lay it out plainly so you can read the evidence and reach your own conclusions.
Vendor scoreboard
8 vendorsEvery tracked vendor in the selected category, showing its disclosed CVE volume and CVSS severity mix. Sort by any column to explore; the order is yours, not a ranking or score by us.
| # | Vendor | Volume · severity mix | Total | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Open (estimated, see note) | Open vendor page |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | F53 product families | 765 | 39 | 429 | 284 | 13 | 285 | ||
| 02 | Ivanti3 product families | 148 | 24 | 68 | 55 | 1 | 141 | ||
| 03 | Fortinet10 product families | 90 | 3 | 49 | 30 | 8 | 28 | ||
| 04 | Palo Alto Networks5 product families | 38 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 5 | 13 | ||
| 05 | Citrix1 product families | 37 | 8 | 21 | 8 | 0 | 15 | ||
| 06 | Tailscale1 product families | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 07 | Check Point4 product families | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 08 | Appgate1 product families | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
“Open in latest” counts and inferred versions are heuristic estimates derived from CVE data density and will lag actual vendor releases. Confidence badges indicate the strength of each inference. This is a security-research reference, not a vendor advisory feed.
Head-to-head
Zero-Trust / ZTNAComparison pages are generated per vendor pair from a slug — any tracked pair works Suggestions below are scoped to Zero-Trust / ZTNA.
/<vendor>-vs-<vendor>
1,083 CVEs across 8 vendors in Zero-Trust / ZTNA